Google Updates

Google’s Broad Core March 2019 Algorithm Update

Google’s March 2019 Core Update — the second major broad core update of that year — rolled out from 12 March and finished a few days later. It was officially the “March 2019 Core Update” but some SEOs informally called it “Florida 2” (no relation to the 2003 Florida update). The update shifted rankings for […]

Tarun Sharma
Tarun Sharma Founder, Chetaru
|
Jun 22, 2020
|
3 min read
Share

More Growth? > More leads...

We are ready to work with your business and generate some real results…

Let's Talk

Google’s March 2019 Core Update — the second major broad core update of that year — rolled out from 12 March and finished a few days later. It was officially the “March 2019 Core Update” but some SEOs informally called it “Florida 2” (no relation to the 2003 Florida update). The update shifted rankings for a wide range of sites, especially those still recovering from the August 2018 “Medic” update.

This post is a record of what the update was, what changed, and what it still teaches us about broad core updates more broadly.

What was the March 2019 Core Update?

A broad core update is a change to Google’s main search algorithm rather than a tweak to a single signal. Smaller updates run every day across Google’s ranking systems. A broad core update is different in scale — it is a deliberate, announced refresh of how Google evaluates content and relevance across the whole index.

Three things to remember about broad core updates:

  • They are not penalties. Sites that drop in rankings are not being punished for breaking a rule.
  • They are not targeted at a specific niche or industry.
  • They re-evaluate content quality and relevance signals across the board, often with effects that take weeks to settle.

Google’s public guidance on broad core updates has stayed essentially the same since 2019: there is nothing to “fix” in the sense of a manual action. The recommendation is to keep producing the best content you can for your audience.

What we know about its impact

The March 2019 update produced visible movement in the SERPs:

  • Many sites hit by the August 2018 “Medic” update (heavily weighted toward Your-Money-Your-Life topics — health, finance, legal) saw partial recoveries.
  • Other sites that had been stable for months suddenly moved up or down significantly.
  • Most websites, however, saw no meaningful change — the update was broad, but not universal.

There was no single ranking factor that explained who won or lost. As Danny Sullivan repeated at the time, broad core updates revise how Google evaluates the existing signals it already uses, rather than introducing new ones.

What Google told site owners

Google’s advice — then and now — focuses on content quality rather than technical fixes:

“We suggest focusing on ensuring you’re offering the best content you can. That’s what our algorithms seek to reward. If you understand how raters learn to assess good content, that might help you improve your own content — and, in turn, perhaps do better in search.”

The “raters” Google refers to are the people who follow the Search Quality Rater Guidelines — a public document that explains how Google trains its systems to judge content quality, expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness.

If your site lost ground after a core update, the practical first step is to read the Quality Rater Guidelines and compare what you publish against what they describe as high-quality content.

Chetaru’s view at the time

“Following Google’s guidelines, focus on building great content with good content writers, and avoid blackhat methods. This is a great way to stay above the wave of Google algorithm changes.”

– Dean, SEO specialist at Chetaru.

That advice has aged well. Every broad core update Google has rolled out since March 2019 has rewarded the same things: content depth, clear expertise, accurate information, and a useful page experience.

What the March 2019 update still teaches us

Looking back, three lessons hold up:

  1. Broad core updates re-weight existing signals. They do not introduce a new ranking factor you can quickly chase. There is no checkbox fix.
  2. Recovery happens at the next core update, not in between. If you make significant content improvements after losing rankings, those improvements are usually validated when the next broad core update rolls out — not on the next crawl.
  3. The Quality Rater Guidelines remain the closest thing to a published rubric. Reading them carefully is more productive than reading post-update analysis from third-party blogs.

For a working summary of how to react to a broad core update today: audit content quality against the Quality Rater Guidelines, fix thin or outdated pages, strengthen author expertise signals, and resist the temptation to make hasty structural changes. Then wait for the next update.